We put the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max through our rigorous DXOMARK Selfie test suite to measure its performance in photo and video from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.
Please note that all iPhone 15 Pro Max sample images in this review have been converted to JPG format. Image quality was analyzed using the original HEIC files. For both photo and video, the best visualization pipeline for an optimal HDR experience is described in the article.
Overview
Key front camera specifications:
- 12MP sensor
- f/1.9-aperture lens
- Autofocus
- 4K video at 24/25/30/60 fps, 1080p at 25/30/60/120 fps (4K at 30 fps tested)
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
selfie
145
Photo
Exposure
97
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Color
103
106
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Best: Google Pixel 8 Pro (106)
Focus
103
105
Honor Magic6 Pro
Best: Honor Magic6 Pro (105)
Texture
76
79
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro
Best: Asus ZenFone 7 Pro (79)
Noise
61
94
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Best: Huawei Mate 50 Pro (94)
Artifacts
91
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Flash
78
93
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Best: Huawei Mate 50 Pro (93)
Bokeh
80
Honor Magic6 Pro
156
Video
Exposure
87
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Color
90
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Focus
91
92
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Best: Huawei Mate 40 Pro (92)
Texture
84
97
Asus ZenFone 6
Best: Asus ZenFone 6 (97)
Noise
71
83
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Best: Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (83)
Artifacts
87
92
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Best: Apple iPhone 12 mini (92)
Stabilization
82
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Position in Global Ranking 2nd
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
151
2. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
2. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
4. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
145
4. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
145
4. Google Pixel 8 Pro
145
4. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
145
8. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
144
8. Apple iPhone 14
144
8. Huawei P50 Pro
144
11. Google Pixel 7 Pro
142
11. Huawei Mate 40 Pro
142
13. Huawei P40 Pro
141
13. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
141
15. Google Pixel 7a
140
16. Google Pixel 7
138
16. Google Pixel 6 Pro
138
18. Asus ZenFone 7 Pro
137
18. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
137
20. Huawei nova 6 5G
136
20. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
136
22. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
135
22. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
135
22. Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos)
135
25. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
134
25. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
134
25. Apple iPhone 13 mini
134
25. Apple iPhone 13
134
25. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos)
134
30. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
133
31. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
132
31. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
132
31. Apple iPhone 12 mini
132
31. Apple iPhone 12
132
31. Asus ZenFone 6
132
31. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
132
37. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Exynos)
130
37. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
39. Google Pixel 6
129
39. Samsung Galaxy S10+ (Exynos)
129
41. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
128
42. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
127
43. Google Pixel 5
126
44. Vivo X90 Pro+
125
44. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
125
46. Google Pixel 4
124
46. Huawei Mate 30 Pro
124
48. Google Pixel 3
123
48. Honor Magic5 Pro
123
48. OnePlus 8 Pro
123
51. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
51. Apple iPhone 11
122
51. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
122
54. Xiaomi 11T Pro
121
55. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
119
56. Huawei P30 Pro
118
57. Oppo Find X5 Pro
116
57. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
116
59. Vivo X70 Pro+
115
59. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
115
59. Xiaomi 11T
115
62. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
114
63. OnePlus 7 Pro
113
64. Honor 20 Pro
112
64. Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
112
64. Xiaomi Mi 11
112
67. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
111
68. Apple iPhone SE (2020)
110
69. Xiaomi Mi MIX 3
109
69. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
109
71. OnePlus 8T
107
71. Samsung Galaxy A71
107
73. Oppo Reno6 5G
106
74. Apple iPhone XS Max
105
75. Vivo X51 5G
103
76. Honor V30 Pro
102
76. Sony Xperia 5
102
78. Nokia 7.2
100
78. Sony Xperia 1
100
78. Xiaomi Mi CC9 Pro Premium Edition
100
81. Google Pixel 2
99
82. Oppo Find X2 Pro
97
83. Huawei Mate 20 Pro
96
83. Realme X2 Pro
96
85. Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
95
86. Lenovo Z6 Pro
94
86. Samsung Galaxy S8
94
88. Huawei P20 Pro
91
89. Apple iPhone X
89
89. Meitu T9
89
91. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
83
92. Meitu V6
77
93. ZTE Axon 20 5G
31
94. Intex Aqua Selfie
25
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking 2nd
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
151
2. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
2. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
4. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
145
4. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
145
4. Google Pixel 8 Pro
145
4. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
145
8. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
144
8. Huawei P50 Pro
144
10. Google Pixel 7 Pro
142
10. Huawei Mate 40 Pro
142
12. Huawei P40 Pro
141
12. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
141
14. Google Pixel 6 Pro
138
15. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
137
16. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
136
17. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
135
17. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
135
17. Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Exynos)
135
20. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
134
20. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
134
20. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos)
134
23. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
133
24. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
132
24. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
132
26. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Exynos)
130
26. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
28. Samsung Galaxy S10+ (Exynos)
129
29. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
128
30. Vivo X90 Pro+
125
30. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
125
32. Huawei Mate 30 Pro
124
33. Honor Magic5 Pro
123
33. OnePlus 8 Pro
123
35. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
35. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
122
37. Huawei P30 Pro
118
38. Oppo Find X5 Pro
116
39. Vivo X70 Pro+
115
39. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
115
41. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
114
42. Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
112
43. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
111
44. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
109
45. Apple iPhone XS Max
105
46. Sony Xperia 1
100
47. Oppo Find X2 Pro
97
48. Huawei Mate 20 Pro
96
49. Huawei P20 Pro
91
50. Apple iPhone X
89
51. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
83
Pros
- Accurate exposure and wide dynamic range for photos and videos
- Reliable and fast autofocus with a wide depth of field
- High levels of detail in bright light for photos and videos
- Effective stabilization when holding the device still and when moving while recording
- Very accurate subject isolation in bokeh mode
Cons
- Noise across all shooting conditions
- Occasional color quantization artifacts in photos and videos
- Occasional sharpness differences between frames when recording video while walking
The Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max delivered outstanding results in the DXOMARK Selfie tests, earning itself the top spot in our smartphone front camera ranking. The new device uses a similar front camera hardware as the previous iPhone 14 generation but still showed notable advancements in both photo and video, thanks to improvements in the software.
The iPhone 15 Pro Max performed particularly well and was the best device tested to date in video mode. This was mainly due to impressive improvements in exposure and noise management. The iPhone 15 Pro Max did not quite take the top spot for still imaging. However, it showed notable advancements over its predecessor and particularly excelled in terms of exposure, color and bokeh, delivering the best results to date in these categories.
Overall, the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max is an obvious choice for smartphone users who prioritize creating high-quality image and video content using the front camera.
The combination of Apple’s HEIC image files with embedded HDR data produced amazing results when viewed on a dedicated display. Image results were striking in Photo App on macOS Sonoma on an XDR Display and the photo app on the iPhone 15 Pro Max display alike, with brighter and more vivid rendering than ever. However, users of displays, devices or apps that do not support Apple’s photo HDR format will only see JPG images without the HDR effect.
Test summary
About DXOMARK Selfie tests: For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 1,500 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the front camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the user’s needs and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as close-up and group selfies. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K. For more information about the DXOMARK Selfie test protocol, click here.More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses .Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us on how to receive a full report.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Selfie Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph compares overall photo and video DXOMARK Selfie scores between tested devices and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices.
Photo
145
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
Honor Magic6 Pro
Honor Magic6 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Photo scores vs Ultra-Premium
The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Range of focus and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses.
In still image mode, the iPhone 15 Pro Max front camera showed important improvements over the previous generation, producing class-leading results in exposure and color, as well as bokeh where our testers were impressed with the precise subject isolation and nice bokeh gradient. The autofocus system worked reliably, and a wide depth of field ensured good focus on all subjects in group shots. Detail levels were high in bright light, but image noise was noticeable across all light conditions, like on previous iPhone generations.
Exposure
97
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Highest Score
Exposure is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the face(s) in various use cases and light conditions. Other factors evaluated are the contrast and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera's ability to provide the same rendering when shooting consecutive images in a row.
Compared to the previous iPhone generation, the iPhone 15 Pro Max has significantly improved in terms of dynamic range. Face exposure and contrast were still accurate in most conditions, but highlight clipping was noticeably reduced.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Bright face exposure, wide dynamic range on background
Apple iPhone 14 Pro – Bright face exposure, highlight clipping on background
Huawei Mate 50 Pro – Good face exposure but stronger highlight clipping than iPhone 15 Pro Max
The iPhone 15 Pro Max also provided excellent contrast on faces. This was especially appreciable when viewing the images on an HDR display, such as the iPhone display itself, the latest generation iPad Pro, or an Apple Mac with Sonoma and XDR display.
Color
103
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
106
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Color is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The image quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability.
The HDR format also helped produce very natural and pleasant colors, even in challenging light conditions. Skin tones looked very natural, with subtle color variations and authentic hues. This was, again, especially noticeable when viewing images on an HDR display. In addition, the iPhone front camera captured nice colors on background elements, such as the sky or vegetation.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Pleasant skin tones, nice color on sky and trees
Apple iPhone 14 Pro – Pleasant skin tones, nice color on sky and trees
Huawei Mate 50 Pro – Less pleasant skin tone rendering
Focus
103
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
105
Honor Magic6 Pro
Honor Magic6 Pro
Autofocus tests evaluate the accuracy of the focus on the subject’s face, the repeatability of an accurate focus, and the depth of field. While a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single-subject selfie or close-up shot, it can be problematic in specific conditions such as group selfies; both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from 30cm to 150cm, and in low light to outdoor conditions.
Like its predecessor, the iPhone 15 Pro Max uses an autofocus system in the front camera. This allows the camera to optimize focus across a range of subject distances. It also helps increase background detail when shooting at longer subject distances, for example with a selfie stick. Compared to the previous generation, our testers observed even fewer focus failures across all test conditions.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Face and background in focus
Apple iPhone 14 Pro – Face and background in focus
Huawei Mate 50 Pro – Face slightly out of focus, blurry background
Texture
76
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
79
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro
Texture tests analyze the level of details and the texture of subjects in the images taken in the lab as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, particular attention is paid to the level of details in facial features, such as the eyes. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Dead Leaves chart.
Texture acutance evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of texture acutance with the level of lux for two holding conditions. The texture acutance is measured on the Dead Leaves chart in the Close-up Dead Leaves setup.
Noise
61
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
94
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, and structure on real-life images as well as images of charts taken in the lab. For natural images, particular attention is paid to the noise on faces, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the DXOMARK Dead Leaves chart and the standardized measurement such as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.
Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the Close-up Dead Leaves setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
In low light, noise management left some room for improvement. Image noise was quite noticeable on both subject and background. The observations in our perceptual tests were confirmed by objective measurements in the lab.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Low light
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Loss of detail, noise
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max - Low light
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max - Noise
Huawei Mate 50 Pro - Low light
Huawei Mate 50 Pro - Low noise levels, slightly unnatural detail
Artifacts
91
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Highest Score
The artifacts evaluation looks at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, distortion measurement on the Dot chart and MTF, and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab. Particular attention is paid to ghosting, quantization, halos, and hue shifts on the face among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction on the score. The main artifacts observed and corresponding point loss are listed below.
Main photo artifacts penalties
Bokeh
80
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Highest Score
Bokeh is tested in one dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all the images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce portrait photography comparable to one taken with a DSLR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur spotlights. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.
The previous iPhone generation already delivered a great front camera bokeh simulation and was at the top for this category in our database. The 15 Pro Max has now raised the bar even higher, capturing the best bokeh images we have seen to date. Our test samples featured a smooth blur gradient, as well as foreground blur, accurate depth estimation, and a natural bokeh shape. Thanks to improved subject isolation, bokeh mode images looked more authentic and natural, with even fine detail, such as hair, nicely preserved.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Slight depth artifacts around the face, nice blur gradient
Apple iPhone 14 Pro – Depth artifacts around the face, nice blur gradient
Huawei Mate 50 Pro – Depth artifacts, no blur gradient
Video
156
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Highest Score
About DXOMARK Selfie Video tests
DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the front camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.
Learn more about how we test camera
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Video scores vs Ultra-Premium
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, smoothness, and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.
When recording front camera video, the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max excelled in exposure, color (white balance), texture, and autofocus. The combination of these strengths allowed the device to push the level of front camera video quality to new heights and earn itself the current top score for Selfie Video.
Compared to the predecessor 14 Pro Max, noise reduction has been improved and our testers also observed slightly higher levels of detail. However, it is worth noting that the video mode is not without its imperfections. For instance, noise could still be noticeable in low light. On occasion we also observed a slight deviation in skin tone rendering recording backlit indoor scenes. Overall, video stabilization was highly effective, but there were occasionally noticeable variations in sharpness between frames when recording while in motion.
The front camera video mode of the iPhone 15 Pro Max has been tested at 4K resolution, 30 frames per second, and in the Dolby Vision format.
Exposure
87
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Highest Score
Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the face and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed.
In our test, the iPhone 15 Pro Max consistently delivered clear and well-exposed videos across all test conditions. In addition, the improved dynamic range resulted in minimal highlight clipping.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Accurate face exposure throughout the clip, wide dynamic range
Apple iPhone 14 Pro – Accurate face exposure throughout the clip, wide dynamic range
Google Pixel 7 Pro – Good face exposure, wide dynamic range
Color
90
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Highest Score
Image-quality color analysis looks at skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, stability of the white balance and its adaption when light is changing.
Color rendering was natural in most conditions, without any noticeable color casts. Skin tones were rendered accurately, ensuring realistic group shots and preserving the distinct characteristics and natural appearance of all skin tone types.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Pleasant skin tones
Apple iPhone 14 Pro – Pleasant skin tones
Google Pixel 7 Pro – Pleasant skin tones
Focus
91
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
92
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
In our front camera tests, the autofocus was quick and reliable even when recording on the move. Our testers observed hardly any failures, with sharp subjects and good background detail, even when recording on the move.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Wide depth of field, fine detail in background
Apple iPhone 14 Pro – Wide depth of field, fine detail in background
Google Pixel 7 Pro – Wide depth of field, good detail in background
Texture
84
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
97
Asus ZenFone 6
Asus ZenFone 6
Texture tests analyze the level of details and texture of the real-life videos as well as the videos of charts recorded in the lab. Natural video recordings are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the level of detail on the facial features. Objective measurements are performed of images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart.
The iPhone 15 Pro Max did not quite beat the very best in terms of video texture, but still maintained impressively high levels of detail, particularly in bright conditions. Fine detail was preserved effectively, with noticeable improvements over last year’s iPhone 14 generation.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Good fine detail
Apple iPhone 14 Pro – Good fine detail
Google Pixel 7 Pro – Good detail
Texture acutance evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of texture acutance with the level of lux for two holding conditions. The texture acutance is measured on the Dead Leaves chart in the Close-up Dead Leaves setup.
Noise
71
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
83
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording as well as videos of charts taken in the lab. Natural videos are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the noise on faces. Objective measurements are performed on the videos of charts recorded in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visual noise chart.
Noise reduction remained a challenge for the iPhone 15 Pro Max, but some improvements over the iPhone 14 Pro were noticeable. When recording in bright light, noise was hardly noticeable, but in low light conditions luminance noise could make an appearance, especially on background elements and in the corners of the frame.
- Spatial Noise
- Temporal Noise
Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.
Stabilization
82
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Highest Score
Stabilization evaluation tests the ability of the device to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any others means. The evaluation looks at overall residual motion on the face and the background, smoothness and jellow artifacts, during walk and paning use cases in various lighting conditions. The video below is an extract from one of the tested scenes.
Like on the previous iPhone generation, video stabilization was impressive, counteracting even fairly challenging camera motion effectively. Videos recorded while holding the device still were perfectly steady and walking clips were rendered smoothly, thanks to a subtle combination of face and background stabilization. However, our testers still observed some sharpness differences between frames when recording while walking.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Effective stabilization, slight sharpness differences between frames
Apple iPhone 14 Pro – Effective stabilization, slight sharpness differences between frames
Google Pixel 7 Pro – Good stabilization, sharpness difference between frames
Artifacts
87
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
92
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab as well as frame-rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as quantization, hue shift, and face-rendering artifacts among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and corresponding point loss are listed below
In our front camera tests, clips recorded with the iPhone 15 Pro Max were consistently pretty much free of unwanted artifacts. Only in low light did we observe some color quantization on occasion. Slight ghosting could be noticeable around subjects in backlit scenes, or when capturing moving subjects in low light.
Main video artifacts penalties